You are here: Home>>News>>Riveting Machine News

What Types of Automatic Riveting Machines Are There? Handheld, Fixed, Dual-Gun and Robotic Cell Compared - BISUDI

Published: 2026-03-05 09:45:45 Views: 6 views Author: admin

What types of automatic riveting machines are there? Handheld, fixed, dual-gun and robotic cell compared

By form and automation degree, automatic riveting machines usually fall into four categories: handheld automatic rivet gun, tabletop/fixed model, one-out-of-two dual-gun model and robotic riveting cell. They are not a simple "high vs. low end" relationship but correspond to different product structures, volumes and investment stages. This article explains each one and gives selection advice.

I. Comparison of the four model types

Type	Working Method	Applicable Scenario	Feature
Handheld automatic rivet gun	Worker moves with the gun, the main unit feeds rivets automatically	Large parts, scattered points, multi-variety small-batch	Flexible, small investment, quick to learn
Tabletop/fixed	Workpiece fixed on a workbench/fixture	Small parts, fixed stations, dense points	Good consistency, can take fixtures
One-out-of-two dual gun	Two guns rivet in parallel	Standardized shells, cabinet mass-production lines	Dual station, efficiency nearly doubled
Robotic riveting cell	Robot holds the gun, moves and feeds automatically	Large-batch fixed points such as battery trays and automotive parts	Unmanned, stable cycle, project-based integration

Photo: handheld automatic rivet gun, suited to large, multi-variety, scattered-point work

II. Subdivision by feeding and gun type

Beyond equipment form, they can also be distinguished by process and feed structure: by process into automatic riveting machines (blind rivets/pull rivets), automatic rivet nut guns (rivet nuts) and automatic rivet guns; by feed structure, the common types are vibratory-bowl and disc-hopper - the vibratory bowl has strong sorting versatility, while the disc hopper changes over quickly and runs quieter; by gun count into single gun and one-out-of-two dual gun. BISUDI common models deliver about 12,800N pulling force and a cycle of about 80/minute, with greater force and special strokes customizable.

III. Typical choices by industry

Industry	Typical Workpiece	Common Model
Computer/server/communication cases and cabinets	Case panels, cabinet frames	Handheld gun + fixed, dual gun for mass-production lines
Automotive parts	Interior parts, brackets, assemblies	Dual gun, robotic cell
New energy lithium battery/photovoltaic	Battery trays, structural parts, frames	Mainly robotic riveting cells
Sheet metal/power cabinets/home appliances, kitchen and bath	Cabinets, housings, brackets	Handheld gun, fixed

Photo: robotic riveting cell, suited to large-batch, fixed-point standardized lines

IV. Selection and upgrade path

Most enterprises suit "step-by-step automation": first pilot with a handheld or fixed standard machine to replace manual rivet threading and loading, with one machine replacing about 3 workers and common payback in 2-6 months; after volume and standardization rise, add a dual gun or robotic cell, and the main-unit platform expands smoothly. Customers can select by their industry characteristics, such as automotive parts, electronic cases, new energy, sheet-metal power distribution and home appliances; for details seeIndustry Application Solutions。

V. Investment and payback comparison of the four model types

Type	Investment Tier	Payback Feature
Handheld automatic rivet gun	Entry tier, smallest investment	Replaces loading labor with immediate effect, usually fastest payback
Tabletop/fixed	Mid tier (with workbench fixture)	Yield gains from better consistency, stable payback
One-out-of-two dual gun	Upper-mid tier	Mass-production shell efficiency nearly doubled, more cost-effective by cycle
Robotic riveting cell	Project-based investment	Calculated by whole-line labor savings and unmanned benefits, suited to large-batch dedicated lines

Note: the specific price varies with pulling force, feeding method and non-standard workload and must be quoted by rivet and workpiece; payback is commonly 2-6 months, subject to trial measurement data.

VI. A simple selection decision sequence

Step one, look at the rivet: fix the type and spec range; step two, look at volume: multi-variety small-batch leans handheld/fixed, large-batch fixed points lean dual gun/robot; step three, look at budget and stage: pilot with a standard machine then roll out upgrades; step four, close the loop with trial data: sign only after on-site sampling verifies cycle and yield. Following this sequence, you basically will not pick the wrong direction.

Type Selection FAQ

Type FAQ

Q1: With a limited budget, which to start with?

Start with a handheld automatic rivet gun or tabletop fixed standard machine - small investment and quick effect, automating the most labor-intensive loading step first.

Q2: Is a dual gun always suited to mass production?

A dual gun suits standardized workpieces with two symmetric columns and dense points; with scattered points or frequent changeovers the benefit is limited, so a trial comparison is recommended.

Q3: Does a robotic cell need a production line?

A robotic cell can run as a single station or connect to a whole line, and is usually made into a project solution as a workstation, needing workpiece point and cycle data.

Q4: Same-type models from different makers differ greatly in price; where is the difference?

Mainly in feed-mechanism and component grade, machining/assembly precision, in-house trial thoroughness and after-sales parts ability. It is recommended to inquire with the same rivet specs and acceptance standard, and decide after a trial comparison.